Download Full Text (65 KB)
The authors analyze and assess Partnership for Peace (PfP) from the perspective of the political realities which govern NATO. They counter the critics of PfP with an analysis of its exact provisions. Moreover, by drawing on the Alliance's historical record regarding expansion, they argue that PfP is the best and most realistic means available to resolve the prickly issue of NATO enlargement. The authors do not ignore existing and potential shortcomings in PfP and specify where conceptual, as well as practical, problems will require the Alliance's immediate action.
Partnership for Peace; PfP; NATO; Europe; CSCE; NACC; Johnsen; Young
William T. Johnsen Dr. and Thomas-Durell Young Dr.,
Partnership for Peace: Discerning Fact from Fiction ( US Army War College Press, 1994),