Abstract
Presidential management style, foreign policy preferences, and domestic political interests all affect the national security agenda. International crises, however, are particularly likely to garner the attention of the National Security Council. This article analyzes a novel data set of all the issues raised at National Security Council meetings from 1947 to 1993 and finds that contemporaneous crises are very likely to be discussed, but that crisis management attenuates the Council’s attention to noncrisis national security matters. The results suggest presidents focus on crises at the expense of other strategic matters, and they do so when political conditions favor crisis management.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.55540/0031-1723.3333
Recommended Citation
Neil N. Snyder, "Tyranny of the Inbox: Managing the US National Security Agenda," Parameters 55, no. 1 (2025), doi:10.55540/0031-1723.3333.
