Abstract
This article argues that thinking creatively about war termination, both philosophically and politically, utilizing jus post bellum principles and counterintuitive political trade-offs, reveals an opportunity to achieve a sustainable peace that approximates justice. The article surveys how war aims among belligerents have changed, indicating that further change is possible, particularly at the point of war termination. Next, the article examines jus post bellum principles and their application to the Russia-Ukraine War. Finally, the article contends that Ukraine relinquishing Crimea and the Donbas in exchange for NATO membership might be the key to achieving a durable peace that addresses long-term security.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
10.55540/0031-1723.3345
Recommended Citation
Nathaniel B. Davis & Marlon A. Thomas, "A More Perfect Peace: Can the Russia-Ukraine War End Justly?," Parameters 55, no. 2 (2025), doi:10.55540/0031-1723.3345.
Included in
Defense and Security Studies Commons, International Relations Commons, Military History Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, National Security Law Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Peace and Conflict Studies Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Politics and Social Change Commons, Public Administration Commons, Public Affairs Commons, Terrorism Studies Commons